In this blog post, I will share a draft of my Quick Reference Guide (QRG), and I will address what type of feedback I hope to get on it.
As I was writing my QRG, I realized very quickly that scientists have a hard time staying away from scientific jargon. I tried to explain the context of my controversy as best as I could, but please let me know if there is too little/too much explanation. I also realized that I sometimes ramble and summarize a little too much. I'm especially worried that some sections are too long and don't have enough analysis in them. Please let me know if there is anything you think I need to address in my QRG or something I might need to leave out. Don't be afraid to leave feedback, as I am really looking to improve my writing and would love some critique! Thank you!
Link to the draft of my Quick Reference Guide: https://docs.google.com/a/email.arizona.edu/document/d/1IEFr_x3RQZJ1T9-_KXvID4WgNmduOmZxw70OSADVm2s/edit?usp=sharing
 |
| McPhee, Nic, "Editing a paper." 01/26/08 via flickr. Attribution ShareAlike License. |
As I was writing my QRG, I realized very quickly that scientists have a hard time staying away from scientific jargon. I tried to explain the context of my controversy as best as I could, but please let me know if there is too little/too much explanation. I also realized that I sometimes ramble and summarize a little too much. I'm especially worried that some sections are too long and don't have enough analysis in them. Please let me know if there is anything you think I need to address in my QRG or something I might need to leave out. Don't be afraid to leave feedback, as I am really looking to improve my writing and would love some critique! Thank you!
Link to the draft of my Quick Reference Guide: https://docs.google.com/a/email.arizona.edu/document/d/1IEFr_x3RQZJ1T9-_KXvID4WgNmduOmZxw70OSADVm2s/edit?usp=sharing
No comments:
Post a Comment