Chiltepinster, "Mocking Bird Argument." 06/26/11 via Pixabay. Attribution-ShareAlike License. |
In this case, an evaluative, proposal, or refutation argument might not work very well. Because this technology is so new and controversial, no solution has really be proposed to evaluate. Also due to this, it would be difficult to propose any simple solution that my audience would be able to understand. Similarly, a refutation argument might be difficult for my audience to understand, especially if they are not very familiar with the issue under debate.
Reflection
For this reflection, I read Sam's post on her Rhetorical Action Plan and Considering Types, as well as Chelsea's post on her Rhetorical Action Plan and Considering Types. Both of them did a great job matching their argument types with their rhetorical action plans. They both narrowed down their audiences, chose their genres based on this, and then chose their argument types based what they are arguing and whom they are arguing for. I think this strategy is very effective, and it is something I did as well with my own planning. I did realize that their audiences/genres were a little more specific than mine, so this might be something that I'll need to work on as I continue with this project. Overall, however, I am happy with how my own blog posts turned out.
I think your analysis here is very accurate. A position argument would most likely work best for your topic. I feel like it would be perhaps best, if at all possible, to include elements of both a causal and a position argument into your paper if that is possible. I know I'm trying something like that (as well as rolling in every other sort of argument that isn't a refutation as well). Good luck again!
ReplyDelete